On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 02:00:54PM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote: > On Sun, 2003-06-22 at 13:35, Daniel Stone wrote: > > How are the other GL packages named - mesa-libgl1 and friends? > > No, as has been discussed here, it's still mesag3 for hysterical > reasons. We have to set a good example. :) "Historical reasons", or "hysterical raisins". :) > > If so, why not xfree86-libgl1? > > I like libgl1-xfree86 better because the emphasis is on libgl1. Fair enough, but then again, why is mesa-libglu1, called mesa-libglu1? > OTOH xlibmesa-gl(1) have the advantage that xlibmesa-gl-dev can stay the > same, allowing for a smoother transition. > > Also, is there a naming scheme yet for the other libraries to be split > out of xlibs, which might be applicable here? The standard way - libfooN. Daniel, enamoured with Dasher -- Daniel Stone <dstone@trinity.unimelb.edu.au> Developer, Trinity College, University of Melbourne
Attachment:
pgpmSntGW6d7k.pgp
Description: PGP signature