On Fri, Jun 20, 2003 at 06:09:35PM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> * drop xlibmesa-glu* in favour of libglu1-mesa*
> * fix xlibmesa-drm-src name; the DRM isn't a library, and it has
> nothing whatsoever to do with Mesa. Something like
> drm-module-src maybe?
> * xlibmesa-gl{,-dev,-dbg} is already better than xlibmesa4-gl*,
> thanks. Does anything speak against xlibmesa-gl{1,-dev,-dbg} (1
> being the OpenGL API/ABI version) though, which would be
> consistent with my current dri-trunk packages?
Err, why would we have xlibmesa-gl1 and libglu1-mesa? That's woefully
inconsistent - I thought the whole point of this was consistency, no?
--
Daniel Stone <dstone@trinity.unimelb.edu.au>
Developer, Trinity College, University of Melbourne
Attachment:
pgpAW7S7rge1O.pgp
Description: PGP signature