Re: 4.3.0-0pre1v1 [XSF, please read]
On Sun, 2003-06-22 at 13:35, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 01:27:33PM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> > On Sun, 2003-06-22 at 12:54, Daniel Stone wrote:
>
> > > Any ideas on what we should call xlibmesa-drm-src and xlibmesa-gl?
> >
> > Time for a little brainstorming session? :)
> >
> > drm-xfree86-module-src ? (I don't really like drm-trunk-module-src etc.
> > either though, so if anybody has a better idea... :)
> >
> > I can live with xlibmesa-gl, though I like xlibmesa-gl1 better. Another
> > random idea would be libgl1-xfree86 .
>
> Mmm, I'm liking libgl1-xfree86. My original name for the DRM sources was
> xfree86-drm-src, but that later got renamed.
Not too bad, methinks.
> How are the other GL packages named - mesa-libgl1 and friends?
No, as has been discussed here, it's still mesag3 for hysterical
reasons. We have to set a good example. :)
> If so, why not xfree86-libgl1?
I like libgl1-xfree86 better because the emphasis is on libgl1.
OTOH xlibmesa-gl(1) have the advantage that xlibmesa-gl-dev can stay the
same, allowing for a smoother transition.
Also, is there a naming scheme yet for the other libraries to be split
out of xlibs, which might be applicable here?
--
Earthling Michel Dänzer \ Debian (powerpc), XFree86 and DRI developer
Software libre enthusiast \ http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=daenzer
Reply to: