Re: "rms-open-letter" choice 3: do not, as the project itself, sign any letter regarding rms

[Ulrike Uhlig <ulrike@debian.org>]

Hi

On 27.03.21 14:01, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 27, 2021 at 01:56:08PM +0100, Timo Weingärtner wrote:
> > 27.03.21 13:03 Kurt Roeckx:
> > > I've added this option on the website. I'm still processing emails.
> > >
> > > Note that it's my interpretation that if changes are accepts that
> > > there is no need to second it again. If you don't agree with the
> > > changes need to say so, and which point and become the proposer of
> > > a new option and need to look for seconds again.
> > >
> > > Please let me know if there is something that's currently on the
> > > website that you don't agree with.
> >
> > The content is fine, maybe the headings could be improved to look like (as a
> > recent example) in the systemd GR.
>
> I'm not sure what you mean, but I'm not really happy with the
> current wording of the option names. It's up to the one calling
> for vote to suggest the names. But I'm sure that any suggestions
> are welcome.

If I understand correctly, "Choice 3: Ask Richard Stallman to resign" 
could be renamed to Choice 3: "Do not sign the open letter, instead 
issue a statement expressing Debian's disapproval and ask RMS to resign 
from his functions at the FSF" - making it clear what this is about?

I think this is the option proposed by Sruthi, that's why I Cc:ed her 
explicitly.

The page is here: https://www.debian.org/vote/2021/vote_002

Cheers!
Ulrike