[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: "rms-open-letter" choice 3: do not, as the project itself, sign any letter regarding rms

On Sat, Mar 27, 2021 at 01:56:08PM +0100, Timo Weingärtner wrote:
> Hallo Kurt Roeckx,
> 27.03.21 13:03 Kurt Roeckx:
> > I've added this option on the website. I'm still processing emails.
> > 
> > Note that it's my interpretation that if changes are accepts that
> > there is no need to second it again. If you don't agree with the
> > changes need to say so, and which point and become the proposer of
> > a new option and need to look for seconds again.
> > 
> > Please let me know if there is something that's currently on the
> > website that you don't agree with.
> The content is fine, maybe the headings could be improved to look like (as a 
> recent example) in the systemd GR.

I'm not sure what you mean, but I'm not really happy with the
current wording of the option names. It's up to the one calling
for vote to suggest the names. But I'm sure that any suggestions
are welcome.


Reply to: