[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: "rms-open-letter" choice 3: do not, as the project itself, sign any letter regarding rms

On March 27, 2021 7:15:39 PM GMT+05:30, Ulrike Uhlig <ulrike@debian.org> wrote:
>On 27.03.21 14:01, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
>> On Sat, Mar 27, 2021 at 01:56:08PM +0100, Timo Weingärtner wrote:
>>> 27.03.21 13:03 Kurt Roeckx:
>>>> I've added this option on the website. I'm still processing emails.
>>>> Note that it's my interpretation that if changes are accepts that
>>>> there is no need to second it again. If you don't agree with the
>>>> changes need to say so, and which point and become the proposer of
>>>> a new option and need to look for seconds again.
>>>> Please let me know if there is something that's currently on the
>>>> website that you don't agree with.
>>> The content is fine, maybe the headings could be improved to look
>like (as a
>>> recent example) in the systemd GR.
>> I'm not sure what you mean, but I'm not really happy with the
>> current wording of the option names. It's up to the one calling
>> for vote to suggest the names. But I'm sure that any suggestions
>> are welcome.
>If I understand correctly, "Choice 3: Ask Richard Stallman to resign" 
>could be renamed to Choice 3: "Do not sign the open letter, instead 
>issue a statement expressing Debian's disapproval and ask RMS to resign
>from his functions at the FSF" - making it clear what this is about?

This title would suit the option.


>I think this is the option proposed by Sruthi, that's why I Cc:ed her 
>The page is here: https://www.debian.org/vote/2021/vote_002

Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

Reply to: