debian-vote Mar 2021 by date

[previous month]

[previous page]

Page 1 of 1

[next page]

[Thread Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

Mar 06

Debian Project Leader Elections 2021: Call for nominations Debian Project Secretary - Kurt Roeckx

Mar 11

Re: Debian Project Leader Elections 2021: Call for nominations Jonathan Carter (highvoltage)

Mar 13

Re: Debian Project Leader Elections 2021: Call for nominations Sruthi Chandran
Re: Debian Project Leader Elections 2021: Call for nominations Sruthi Chandran

Mar 18

How to leverage money to accomplish high impact Debian projects Raphael Hertzog
Re: How to leverage money to accomplish high impact Debian projects Jonathan Carter
Re: How to leverage money to accomplish high impact Debian projects Philip Hands
Re: How to leverage money to accomplish high impact Debian projects Jonathan Carter
Re: How to leverage money to accomplish high impact Debian projects Philip Hands

Mar 19

Re: How to leverage money to accomplish high impact Debian projects Jonathan Carter
What changes do you want in Debian? Raphael Hertzog
Should the project hire one or two persons to help the DPL? Raphael Hertzog
Re: How to leverage money to accomplish high impact Debian projects Enrico Zini
Re: How to leverage money to accomplish high impact Debian projects Raphael Hertzog
Re: How to leverage money to accomplish high impact Debian projects Christian Kastner
Re: How to leverage money to accomplish high impact Debian projects Ulrike Uhlig
Re: How to leverage money to accomplish high impact Debian projects Adam Borowski
Leading Debian Sam Hartman
Re: How to leverage money to accomplish high impact Debian projects Louis-Philippe Véronneau
Re: How to leverage money to accomplish high impact Debian projects Sam Hartman
Re: How to leverage money to accomplish high impact Debian projects Sruthi Chandran
How can we make Debian packaging more standardised? Louis-Philippe Véronneau
Re: What changes do you want in Debian? Sruthi Chandran
Re: Should the project hire one or two persons to help the DPL? Sruthi Chandran
Re: How to leverage money to accomplish high impact Debian projects Sruthi Chandran
Having a "DPL committee"? Pierre-Elliott Bécue
Re: Having a "DPL committee"? Sruthi Chandran
Re: Should the project hire one or two persons to help the DPL? Sam Hartman
Re: How can we make Debian packaging more standardised? Sruthi Chandran
Re: How to leverage money to accomplish high impact Debian projects Sruthi Chandran
Re: What changes do you want in Debian? Jonathan Carter
Re: Should the project hire one or two persons to help the DPL? Raphael Hertzog
Re: Should the project hire one or two persons to help the DPL? Christian Kastner
Re: Should the project hire one or two persons to help the DPL? Joerg Jaspert

Mar 20

Re: What changes do you want in Debian? Gunnar Wolf
Re: What changes do you want in Debian? Raphael Hertzog

Mar 21

Re: Should the project hire one or two persons to help the DPL? gregor herrmann
Re: How to leverage money to accomplish high impact Debian projects Raphael Hertzog

Mar 22

Re: Having a "DPL committee"? Jonathan Carter
Re: How can we make Debian packaging more standardised? Jonathan Carter
Re: How to leverage money to accomplish high impact Debian projects Gunnar Wolf
Re: How can we make Debian packaging more standardised? Paride Legovini
Re: How to leverage money to accomplish high impact Debian projects Sam Hartman
Re: How to leverage money to accomplish high impact Debian projects Russ Allbery
Re: How to leverage money to accomplish high impact Debian projects Sam Hartman
Re: How to leverage money to accomplish high impact Debian projects Russ Allbery
Re: How to leverage money to accomplish high impact Debian projects Lucas Nussbaum
Re: How can we make Debian packaging more standardised? Christian Kastner
Re: How can we make Debian packaging more standardised? Jonas Meurer
Re: Should the project hire one or two persons to help the DPL? Didier 'OdyX' Raboud
Re: How can we make Debian packaging more standardised? Didier 'OdyX' Raboud
Re: How to leverage money to accomplish high impact Debian projects Didier 'OdyX' Raboud
Re: Should the project hire one or two persons to help the DPL? Thomas Hochstein

Mar 23

diversity Bart Martens
How to motivate contributors to work on QA Christian Kastner
Re: How to leverage money to accomplish high impact Debian projects Louis-Philippe Véronneau
Re: How to leverage money to accomplish high impact Debian projects Gard Spreemann
Re: How to leverage money to accomplish high impact Debian projects Jonas Smedegaard
Re: How to leverage money to accomplish high impact Debian projects Gard Spreemann
Re: How to leverage money to accomplish high impact Debian projects Jonas Smedegaard
Willingness to share a position statement? Gunnar Wolf
Re: Willingness to share a position statement? Adam Borowski

Mar 24

Re: Willingness to share a position statement? Steve Langasek
Re: Willingness to share a position statement? Harlan Lieberman-Berg
Re: Willingness to share a position statement? Matthias Klumpp
Re: Willingness to share a position statement? M dB
Re: Willingness to share a position statement? Sruthi Chandran
Re: Willingness to share a position statement? Sruthi Chandran
Re: How to leverage money to accomplish high impact Debian projects Andrei POPESCU
Re: Willingness to share a position statement? Philip Hands
Re: Willingness to share a position statement? Gerardo Ballabio
Re: Willingness to share a position statement? Jonas Smedegaard
Re: Willingness to share a position statement? Steve McIntyre
Re: Willingness to share a position statement? Miles Fidelman
Re: How can we make Debian packaging more standardised? Holger Levsen
Re: How can we make Debian packaging more standardised? Simon Richter
Re: How can we make Debian packaging more standardised? Louis-Philippe Véronneau
Re: How can we make Debian packaging more standardised? Sean Whitton
Re: How can we make Debian packaging more standardised? Christian Kastner
Re: Willingness to share a position statement? Adrian Bunk
Re: diversity Jonathan Carter
Re: Willingness to share a position statement? Holger Levsen
General resolution: ratify https://github.com/rms-open-letter/rms-open-letter.github.io Steve Langasek
Re: General resolution: ratify https://github.com/rms-open-letter/rms-open-letter.github.io Louis-Philippe Véronneau
Re: General resolution: ratify https://github.com/rms-open-letter/rms-open-letter.github.io Joerg Jaspert
Re: General resolution: ratify https://github.com/rms-open-letter/rms-open-letter.github.io Neil McGovern
Re: General resolution: ratify https://github.com/rms-open-letter/rms-open-letter.github.io Steve McIntyre
Re: General resolution: ratify https://github.com/rms-open-letter/rms-open-letter.github.io Sam Hartman
Re: diversity Sruthi Chandran
Asking DPL to shorten Discussion Period for rms-open-letter Sam Hartman
Re: General resolution: ratify https://github.com/rms-open-letter/rms-open-letter.github.io Nicolas Dandrimont
Re: General resolution: ratify https://github.com/rms-open-letter/rms-open-letter.github.io Colin Tuckley
Re: General resolution: ratify https://github.com/rms-open-letter/rms-open-letter.github.io Paul R. Tagliamonte
Re: Asking DPL to shorten Discussion Period for rms-open-letter Joerg Jaspert
Re: General resolution: ratify https://github.com/rms-open-letter/rms-open-letter.github.io Steve Langasek
Re: General resolution: ratify https://github.com/rms-open-letter/rms-open-letter.github.io Steve McIntyre
Re: General resolution: ratify https://github.com/rms-open-letter/rms-open-letter.github.io Louis-Philippe Véronneau
Re: General resolution: ratify https://github.com/rms-open-letter/rms-open-letter.github.io Colin Tuckley
Re: General resolution: ratify https://github.com/rms-open-letter/rms-open-letter.github.io Sylvestre Ledru
Re: General resolution: ratify https://github.com/rms-open-letter/rms-open-letter.github.io Joerg Jaspert
Re: Asking DPL to shorten Discussion Period for rms-open-letter Taowa
Re: diversity Thomas Goirand
Re: General resolution: ratify https://github.com/rms-open-letter/rms-open-letter.github.io Paul Tagliamonte
Re: Willingness to share a position statement? Jonathan Carter
Re: General resolution: ratify https://github.com/rms-open-letter/rms-open-letter.github.io Thomas Goirand
Re: Asking DPL to shorten Discussion Period for rms-open-letter Jonathan Carter
Re: Asking DPL to shorten Discussion Period for rms-open-letter Thomas Goirand
Re: Asking DPL to shorten Discussion Period for rms-open-letter Steve Langasek
Re: Willingness to share a position statement? Martina Ferrari
Re: Asking DPL to shorten Discussion Period for rms-open-letter M dB
Re: Asking DPL to shorten Discussion Period for rms-open-letter Jonas Smedegaard

Mar 25

Re: Willingness to share a position statement? Daniel Lenharo
Re: Asking DPL to shorten Discussion Period for rms-open-letter Gunnar Wolf
Re: Willingness to share a position statement? Andrey Rahmatullin
Re: General resolution: ratify https://github.com/rms-open-letter/rms-open-letter.github.io Jonathan Carter (highvoltage)
Re: diversity Thomas Goirand
Re: How to motivate contributors to work on QA Christian Kastner
Re: How to leverage money to accomplish high impact Debian projects Christian Kastner
Re: How to leverage money to accomplish high impact Debian projects Christian Kastner
Re: Willingness to share a position statement? Philip Hands
Re: How to leverage money to accomplish high impact Debian projects Christian Kastner
Re: Re: Willingness to share a position statement? Akhil Varkey
Re: How to leverage money to accomplish high impact Debian projects Philip Hands
Re: Willingness to share a position statement? Simon Avery
Re: diversity Gard Spreemann
Re: General resolution: ratify https://github.com/rms-open-letter/rms-open-letter.github.io Bart Martens
Re: Willingness to share a position statement? (rms-open-letter) Bart Martens
Re: Willingness to share a position statement? Daniel Lenharo
Re: Asking DPL to shorten Discussion Period for rms-open-letter Ansgar
Re: How to motivate contributors to work on QA Ansgar
Question to Jonathan: What did you Mean Sam Hartman
Re: Willingness to share a position statement? Sandro Tosi
Perhaps we should start addressing shortcomings in our eco-system (Was: Re: What changes do you want in Debian?) Jonathan Carter
Re: Perhaps we should start addressing shortcomings in our eco-system (Was: Re: What changes do you want in Debian?) Andrey Rahmatullin
Re: Willingness to share a position statement? Gunnar Wolf
Re: Question to Jonathan: What did you Mean Jonathan Carter
Re: Willingness to share a position statement? Martin Pitt
Re: Willingness to share a position statement? Ansgar
Re: How to leverage money to accomplish high impact Debian projects Louis-Philippe Véronneau
Re: Asking DPL to shorten Discussion Period for rms-open-letter Florian Weimer
Re: How to motivate contributors to work on QA Jonathan Carter
Re: General resolution: ratify https://github.com/rms-open-letter/rms-open-letter.github.io Sruthi Chandran
Re: Willingness to share a position statement? Roberto C. Sánchez
Re: General resolution: ratify https://github.com/rms-open-letter/rms-open-letter.github.io Jonas Smedegaard
Re: Willingness to share a position statement? Margarita Manterola
Re: Willingness to share a position statement? Gard Spreemann
Re: General resolution: ratify https://github.com/rms-open-letter/rms-open-letter.github.io Gard Spreemann
Re: Willingness to share a position statement? Andrey Rahmatullin
Re: Willingness to share a position statement? Jonas Smedegaard
Re: Willingness to share a position statement? Roberto C. Sánchez
Re: Willingness to share a position statement? Sam Hartman
Re: Willingness to share a position statement? Paulo Henrique de Lima Santana
Re: General resolution: ratify https://github.com/rms-open-letter/rms-open-letter.github.io Kurt Roeckx
Re: General resolution: ratify https://github.com/rms-open-letter/rms-open-letter.github.io Russ Allbery
Re: General resolution: ratify https://github.com/rms-open-letter/rms-open-letter.github.io Kurt Roeckx
Re: General resolution: ratify https://github.com/rms-open-letter/rms-open-letter.github.io Antoine Beaupré
Re: Asking DPL to shorten Discussion Period for rms-open-letter Antoine Beaupré
Re: General resolution: ratify https://github.com/rms-open-letter/rms-open-letter.github.io Kurt Roeckx
Re: General resolution: ratify https://github.com/rms-open-letter/rms-open-letter.github.io Gard Spreemann
Re: Willingness to share a position statement? Steve Langasek
Re: General resolution: ratify https://github.com/rms-open-letter/rms-open-letter.github.io Paul R. Tagliamonte
Re: Willingness to share a position statement? Sam Hartman
Re: General resolution: ratify https://github.com/rms-open-letter/rms-open-letter.github.io Sruthi Chandran
Re: Willingness to share a position statement? Sean Whitton
Amendment to rms-open-letter GR Sean Whitton
Re: Amendment to rms-open-letter GR Sam Hartman
Re: Willingness to share a position statement? Sruthi Chandran
Re: General resolution: ratify https://github.com/rms-open-letter/rms-open-letter.github.io Sam Hartman
Re: General resolution: ratify https://github.com/rms-open-letter/rms-open-letter.github.io Sruthi Chandran
Re: Willingness to share a position statement? Gerardo Ballabio
Re: Amendment to rms-open-letter GR Jonathan Carter
Re: Amendment to rms-open-letter GR Stefano Zacchiroli
Re: Willingness to share a position statement? Steve McIntyre
Re: ***UNCHECKED*** Re: Willingness to share a position statement? Simon Richter
The "RMS Open Letter" is based on lies, misrepresentations, and misinformation James Lu
Re: Willingness to share a position statement? Steve McIntyre
Re: Willingness to share a position statement? Roberto C. Sánchez
Re: Re: Willingness to share a position statement? Timo Röhling
Re: Willingness to share a position statement? Adrian Bunk
Re: Willingness to share a position statement? Steve Langasek
Re: Willingness to share a position statement? Steve McIntyre
Re: ***UNCHECKED*** Re: Willingness to share a position statement? Christian Kastner
Re: Willingness to share a position statement? Roberto C. Sánchez
Re: Perhaps we should start addressing shortcomings in our eco-system (Was: Re: What changes do you want in Debian?) Raphael Hertzog
Re: Willingness to share a position statement? Philip Rinn
Why does Debian Care about the FSF Sam Hartman
Re: Willingness to share a position statement? Filippo Rusconi
Re: Willingness to share a position statement? Adrian Bunk
Re: Willingness to share a position statement? Ulrike Uhlig
Re: Asking DPL to shorten Discussion Period for rms-open-letter Thomas Hochstein

Mar 26

Re: ***UNCHECKED*** Re: Re: Willingness to share a position statement? Simon Richter
Re: Willingness to share a position statement? Felix Lechner
Re: Amendment to rms-open-letter GR Richard Laager
Re: ***UNCHECKED*** Re: Re: Willingness to share a position statement? Christian Kastner
"rms-open-letter" GR choice 2: sign https://rms-support-letter.github.io/ Timo Weingärtner
"rms-open-letter" choice 3: do not, as the project itself, sign any letter regarding rms Timo Weingärtner
Re: "rms-open-letter" choice 3: do not, as the project itself, sign any letter regarding rms Martin Michlmayr
Re: "rms-open-letter" choice 3: do not, as the project itself, sign any letter regarding rms Andrey Rahmatullin
Re: Amendment to rms-open-letter GR Gard Spreemann
Re: "rms-open-letter" choice 3: do not, as the project itself, sign any letter regarding rms Timo Weingärtner
Re: "rms-open-letter" choice 3: do not, as the project itself, sign any letter regarding rms Bart Martens
Re: Why does Debian Care about the FSF Andrey Rahmatullin
Re: ***UNCHECKED*** Re: Re: Re: Willingness to share a position statement? Simon Richter
Re: "rms-open-letter" choice 3: do not, as the project itself, sign any letter regarding rms Richard Laager
Re: "rms-open-letter" choice 3: do not, as the project itself, sign any letter regarding rms Andrey Rahmatullin
Re: Amendment to rms-open-letter GR Richard Laager
Re: "rms-open-letter" choice 3: do not, as the project itself, sign any letter regarding rms Jonas Smedegaard
Re: Willingness to share a position statement? Gerardo Ballabio
Re: Amendment to rms-open-letter GR Jonas Smedegaard
Re: "rms-open-letter" choice 3: do not, as the project itself, sign any letter regarding rms Mathias Behrle
Re: General Resolution: Richard Stallman's readmission to the FSF board Dominik George
Re: "rms-open-letter" choice 3: do not, as the project itself, sign any letter regarding rms Jonas Smedegaard
Re: Willingness to share a position statement? Ulrike Uhlig
Re: General Resolution: Richard Stallman's readmission to the FSF board Pierre-Elliott Bécue
Re: "rms-open-letter" choice 3: do not, as the project itself, sign any letter regarding rms Pierre-Elliott Bécue
Re: ***UNCHECKED*** Re: Re: Willingness to share a position statement? Miles Fidelman
Re: General resolution: ratify https://github.com/rms-open-letter/rms-open-letter.github.io Jonas Smedegaard
Re: General Resolution: Richard Stallman's readmission to the FSF board Dominik George
Re: "rms-open-letter" choice 3: do not, as the project itself, sign any letter regarding rms Daniel Lenharo
Re: Asking DPL to shorten Discussion Period for rms-open-letter Jonas Smedegaard
Re: General Resolution: Richard Stallman's readmission to the FSF board Jonas Smedegaard
Re: General Resolution: Richard Stallman's readmission to the FSF board Margarita Manterola
Re: General Resolution: Richard Stallman's readmission to the FSF board Santiago Ruano Rincón
Re: "rms-open-letter" choice 3: do not, as the project itself, sign any letter regarding rms Timo Weingärtner
Re: General Resolution: Richard Stallman's readmission to the FSF board José Vieira
Re: General Resolution: Richard Stallman's readmission to the FSF board Dominik George
Re: The "RMS Open Letter" is based on lies, misrepresentations, and misinformation Ximin Luo
Re: "rms-open-letter" choice 3: do not, as the project itself, sign any letter regarding rms Milan Kupcevic
Re: General Resolution: Richard Stallman's readmission to the FSF board Jonas Smedegaard
Re: ***UNCHECKED*** Re: Re: Willingness to share a position statement? Steve Langasek
Re: Willingness to share a position statement? Steve Langasek
Re: "rms-open-letter" choice 3: do not, as the project itself, sign any letter regarding rms Jonas Smedegaard
Re: General Resolution: Richard Stallman's readmission to the FSF board Benda Xu
Re: General Resolution: Richard Stallman's readmission to the FSF board Sam Hartman
Re: "rms-open-letter" choice 3: do not, as the project itself, sign any letter regarding rms Michael Biebl
Re: "rms-open-letter" choice 3: do not, as the project itself, sign any letter regarding rms Axel Beckert
Amendment to GR on RMS rejoining FSF Sruthi Chandran
Re: General Resolution: Richard Stallman's readmission to the FSF board Pierre-Elliott Bécue
Re: "rms-open-letter" GR choice 2: sign https://rms-support-letter.github.io/ Axel Beckert
Re: Amendment to GR on RMS rejoining FSF Pierre-Elliott Bécue
Re: "rms-open-letter" choice 3: do not, as the project itself, sign any letter regarding rms Gilles Filippini
Re: Amendment to rms-open-letter GR Kurt Roeckx
Re: The "RMS Open Letter" is based on lies, misrepresentations, and misinformation Steve Langasek
Re: Amendment to GR on RMS rejoining FSF Kurt Roeckx
concern - proprietary software promotion in Debian Pasha
Re: Amendment to GR on RMS rejoining FSF Sruthi Chandran
Re: concern - proprietary software promotion in Debian Pierre-Elliott Bécue
Re: Amendment to GR on RMS rejoining FSF Sruthi Chandran
Debian RMS vote, outside perspectives Donald Norwood
Re: Having a "DPL committee"? Pierre-Elliott Bécue
Re: Having a "DPL committee"? Pierre-Elliott Bécue
Re: "rms-open-letter" choice 3: do not, as the project itself, sign any letter regarding rms Filippo Rusconi
Re: Amendment to GR on RMS rejoining FSF Jonas Smedegaard
Re: concern - proprietary software promotion in Debian Jonathan Carter
Re: Having a "DPL committee"? Jonathan Carter
Re: Re: "rms-open-letter" choice 3: do not, as the project itself, sign any letter regarding rms Calum McConnell
"rms-open-letter" choice 4: use debian's resource to perform mitigation Roger Shimizu
Re: "rms-open-letter" choice 3: do not, as the project itself, sign any letter regarding rms Shengjing Zhu
Re: Re: "rms-open-letter" choice 3: do not, as the project itself, sign any letter regarding rms Jonas Smedegaard
Re: "rms-open-letter" choice 3: do not, as the project itself, sign any letter regarding rms Shengjing Zhu
Re: Amendment to GR on RMS rejoining FSF Sean Whitton
Re: Amendment to rms-open-letter GR Sean Whitton
Re: Amendment to rms-open-letter GR Sean Whitton
Re: Amendment to rms-open-letter GR Sean Whitton
Re: Amendment to GR on RMS rejoining FSF Holger Levsen
Re: Amendment to GR on RMS rejoining FSF Richard Laager
Re: Amendment to GR on RMS rejoining FSF Mike Gabriel
Re: "rms-open-letter" choice 3: do not, as the project itself, sign any letter regarding rms Matteo F. Vescovi
Re: Amendment to GR on RMS rejoining FSF Steve McIntyre
Re: Amendment to GR on RMS rejoining FSF Philip Hands
Re: Asking DPL to shorten Discussion Period for rms-open-letter Luke W Faraone
Re: Amendment to GR on RMS rejoining FSF Gard Spreemann
Re: Why does Debian Care about the FSF Simon Avery
Re: Amendment to rms-open-letter GR Stefano Zacchiroli
Re: Willingness to share a position statement? Gerardo Ballabio
Re: Amendment to rms-open-letter GR M dB
Re: General Resolution: Richard Stallman's readmission to the FSF board Dominik George

Mar 27

Re: General resolution: ratify https://github.com/rms-open-letter/rms-open-letter.github.io Christoph Biedl
Re: General Resolution: Richard Stallman's readmission to the FSF board Roberto C. Sánchez
Re: General resolution: ratify https://github.com/rms-open-letter/rms-open-letter.github.io Hilko Bengen
Re: "rms-open-letter" choice 3: do not, as the project itself, sign any letter regarding rms Gunnar Wolf
Re: General Resolution: Richard Stallman's readmission to the FSF board Richard Laager
Re: Amendment to GR on RMS rejoining FSF Gunnar Wolf
Re: Having a "DPL committee"? Sruthi Chandran
Re: Having a "DPL committee"? Sruthi Chandran
Re: Asking DPL to shorten Discussion Period for rms-open-letter Enrico Zini
Re: "rms-open-letter" choice 3: do not, as the project itself, sign any letter regarding rms Matteo F. Vescovi
Re: "rms-open-letter" choice 3: do not, as the project itself, sign any letter regarding rms Michael Biebl
Re: Asking DPL to shorten Discussion Period for rms-open-letter Jonas Smedegaard
Re: Asking DPL to shorten Discussion Period for rms-open-letter Pierre-Elliott Bécue
Re: Asking DPL to shorten Discussion Period for rms-open-letter Martin Steigerwald
Re: Amendment to GR on RMS rejoining FSF Pierre-Elliott Bécue
Re: Willingness to share a position statement? Pierre-Elliott Bécue
Re: Asking DPL to shorten Discussion Period for rms-open-letter Martin Steigerwald
Re: Willingness to share a position statement? Pierre-Elliott Bécue
Re: Asking DPL to shorten Discussion Period for rms-open-letter Martin Steigerwald
Re: "rms-open-letter" choice 3: do not, as the project itself, sign any letter regarding rms Timo Weingärtner
Re: "rms-open-letter" choice 3: do not, as the project itself, sign any letter regarding rms Mathias Behrle
Re: "rms-open-letter" choice 3: do not, as the project itself, sign any letter regarding rms Mathias Behrle
Re: "rms-open-letter" choice 3: do not, as the project itself, sign any letter regarding rms Jonas Smedegaard
Re: "rms-open-letter" choice 3: do not, as the project itself, sign any letter regarding rms Michael Biebl
Re: Asking DPL to shorten Discussion Period for rms-open-letter Jonas Smedegaard
Re: "rms-open-letter" choice 3: do not, as the project itself, sign any letter regarding rms Kurt Roeckx
Re: "rms-open-letter" choice 3: do not, as the project itself, sign any letter regarding rms Milan Kupcevic
Re: Amendment to GR on RMS rejoining FSF Kurt Roeckx
Re: Amendment to GR on RMS rejoining FSF Kurt Roeckx
Re: "rms-open-letter" choice 3: do not, as the project itself, sign any letter regarding rms Timo Weingärtner
Re: "rms-open-letter" choice 3: do not, as the project itself, sign any letter regarding rms Kurt Roeckx
Re: Willingness to share a position statement? Ulrike Uhlig
Re: "rms-open-letter" choice 3: do not, as the project itself, sign any letter regarding rms Ulrike Uhlig
Re: The "RMS Open Letter" is based on lies, misrepresentations, and misinformation Ulrike Uhlig
Re: "rms-open-letter" choice 3: do not, as the project itself, sign any letter regarding rms Milan Kupcevic
Re: "rms-open-letter" choice 3: do not, as the project itself, sign any letter regarding rms Milan Kupcevic
Re: "rms-open-letter" choice 3: do not, as the project itself, sign any letter regarding rms Matteo F. Vescovi
Re: "rms-open-letter" choice 3: do not, as the project itself, sign any letter regarding rms Sruthi Chandran
Re: Asking DPL to shorten Discussion Period for rms-open-letter Wouter Verhelst
Re: "rms-open-letter" choice 3: do not, as the project itself, sign any letter regarding rms Steve Langasek
Re: "rms-open-letter" choice 3: do not, as the project itself, sign any letter regarding rms Mathias Behrle
Re: Asking DPL to shorten Discussion Period for rms-open-letter Jonas Smedegaard

Mar 28

Re: General resolution: ratify https://github.com/rms-open-letter/rms-open-letter.github.io Michael Lustfield
Re: Asking DPL to shorten Discussion Period for rms-open-letter Wouter Verhelst
Re: "rms-open-letter" choice 3: do not, as the project itself, sign any letter regarding rms Bart Martens
Re: General resolution: ratify https://github.com/rms-open-letter/rms-open-letter.github.io Holger Levsen
Re: Amendment to GR on RMS rejoining FSF Pierre-Elliott Bécue
Re: Amendment to GR on RMS rejoining FSF Kurt Roeckx
Re: Asking DPL to shorten Discussion Period for rms-open-letter Jonas Smedegaard
Re: "rms-open-letter" choice 3: do not, as the project itself, sign any letter regarding rms Gilles Filippini
Re: General resolution: ratify https://github.com/rms-open-letter/rms-open-letter.github.io Michael Lustfield
Re: Asking DPL to shorten Discussion Period for rms-open-letter Felix Lechner
opinion on Choice 1 Ivan Shmakov
Re: opinion on Choice 1 Pierre-Elliott Bécue
Re: Asking DPL to shorten Discussion Period for rms-open-letter Pierre-Elliott Bécue
Re: Amendment to GR on RMS rejoining FSF Sam Hartman
Re: Asking DPL to shorten Discussion Period for rms-open-letter Jonas Smedegaard
Re: Asking DPL to shorten Discussion Period for rms-open-letter Eduard Bloch
Re: Asking DPL to shorten Discussion Period for rms-open-letter Pierre-Elliott Bécue
Re: Asking DPL to shorten Discussion Period for rms-open-letter Sam Hartman
Re: "rms-open-letter" GR choice 2: sign https://rms-support-letter.github.io/ Lionel Élie Mamane
Re: Asking DPL to shorten Discussion Period for rms-open-letter Jonas Smedegaard
Re: Asking DPL to shorten Discussion Period for rms-open-letter Milan Kupcevic
Re: Asking DPL to shorten Discussion Period for rms-open-letter Sam Hartman

Mar 29

Re: opinion on Choice 1 Ulrike Uhlig
Re: opinion on Choice 1 Milan Kupcevic
Amendement to GR Statement regarding Stallman's readmission to the FSF board Santiago R.R.
Re: Amendement to GR Statement regarding Stallman's readmission to the FSF board Jonas Smedegaard
Re: Amendement to GR Statement regarding Stallman's readmission to the FSF board Santiago R.R.
Re: Amendement to GR Statement regarding Stallman's readmission to the FSF board Milan Kupcevic
Re: opinion on Choice 1 Felix Lechner
Re: Amendement to GR Statement regarding Stallman's readmission to the FSF board Apollon Oikonomopoulos
Re: Amendement to GR Statement regarding Stallman's readmission to the FSF board Kurt Roeckx
Re: Amendement to GR Statement regarding Stallman's readmission to the FSF board Apollon Oikonomopoulos
Re: Amendement to GR Statement regarding Stallman's readmission to the FSF board Apollon Oikonomopoulos
Re: Amendement to GR Statement regarding Stallman's readmission to the FSF board Holger Levsen
Re: opinion on Choice 1 Ulrike Uhlig
Re: opinion on Choice 1 Jonas Smedegaard

Mar 30

Re: opinion on Choice 1 Ulrike Uhlig
Re: opinion on Choice 1 Andrey Rahmatullin
Re: opinion on Choice 1 Zlatan Todoric
Re: "rms-open-letter" GR choice 2: sign https://rms-support-letter.github.io/ Adam Borowski
Re: opinion on Choice 1 Pierre-Elliott Bécue
Re: opinion on Choice 1 Felix Lechner
Re: Amendement to GR Statement regarding Stallman's readmission to the FSF board Phil Morrell
Re: Amendement to GR Statement regarding Stallman's readmission to the FSF board Zlatan Todoric
Re: ***SPAM*** Re: opinion on Choice 1 Tiago Bortoletto Vaz
Re: ***SPAM*** Re: opinion on Choice 1 Pasha
Re: Re: Cancel "culture" is a threat to Debian Stephan Lachnit
Re: opinion on Choice 1 Pierre-Elliott Bécue
Re: Re: Cancel "culture" is a threat to Debian Sergey B Kirpichev
Re: Amendement to GR Statement regarding Stallman's readmission to the FSF board Zlatan Todoric
Re: Cancel "culture" is a threat to Debian Gard Spreemann
Re: Amendement to GR Statement regarding Stallman's readmission to the FSF board Milan Kupcevic
Re: Re: Cancel "culture" is a threat to Debian Sergey B Kirpichev
Re: opinion on Choice 1 Milan Kupcevic
Re: Cancel "culture" is a threat to Debian Pierre-Elliott Bécue
Re: opinion on Choice 1 Pierre-Elliott Bécue
Re: Amendement to GR Statement regarding Stallman's readmission to the FSF board Santiago R.R.
Re: Amendement to GR Statement regarding Stallman's readmission to the FSF board Zlatan Todoric
Re: opinion on Choice 1 Zlatan Todoric
Re: Amendement to GR Statement regarding Stallman's readmission to the FSF board Milan Kupcevic
Re: Cancel "culture" is a threat to Debian Simon Richter
Re: Cancel "culture" is a threat to Debian Gard Spreemann
Re: Re: Cancel "culture" is a threat to Debian Sergey B Kirpichev
Re: Re: Cancel "culture" is a threat to Debian Sergey B Kirpichev
Re: Cancel "culture" is a threat to Debian Pierre-Elliott Bécue
Re: Amendement to GR Statement regarding Stallman's readmission to the FSF board Apollon Oikonomopoulos
Re: Amendement to GR Statement regarding Stallman's readmission to the FSF board Phil Morrell
Re: Cancel "culture" is a threat to Debian Sergey B Kirpichev
Re: Cancel "culture" is a threat to Debian Pierre-Elliott Bécue
Re: Amendement to GR Statement regarding Stallman's readmission to the FSF board Kurt Roeckx
Re: Willingness to share a position statement? Dmitry Smirnov
Amendment to RMS/FSF GR: Option 4, assert the need to learn and grow from recent events Jonathan Wiltshire
Re: "rms-open-letter" choice 3: do not, as the project itself, sign any letter regarding rms Dmitry Smirnov
Re: Amendment to RMS/FSF GR: Option 4, assert the need to learn and grow from recent events Nicolas Dandrimont
Re: Willingness to share a position statement? Steve McIntyre

Mar 31

Re: Amendment to RMS/FSF GR: Option 4, assert the need to learn and grow from recent events Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
Re: Amendment to RMS/FSF GR: Option 4, assert the need to learn and grow from recent events Pierre-Elliott Bécue
Re: Amendment to RMS/FSF GR: Option 4, assert the need to learn and grow from recent events Richard Laager
Re: Cancel "culture" is a threat to Debian kFwUgYlNqnY
Re: Re: Cancel "culture" is a threat to Debian Sergey B Kirpichev
Re: Amendment to RMS/FSF GR: Option 4, assert the need to learn and grow from recent events Jonathan Wiltshire
Re: Amendment to RMS/FSF GR: Option 4, assert the need to learn and grow from recent events Jonas Smedegaard
Re: Amendment to RMS/FSF GR: Option 4, assert the need to learn and grow from recent events Zlatan Todoric
Re: opinion on Choice 1 Ivan Shmakov
Re: Amendment to RMS/FSF GR: Option 4, assert the need to learn and grow from recent events Paride Legovini
Re: Amendment to RMS/FSF GR: Option 4, assert the need to learn and grow from recent events Holger Levsen
Re: Amendment to RMS/FSF GR: Option 4, assert the need to learn and grow from recent events Micha Lenk
Re: opinion on Choice 1 Pierre-Elliott Bécue
Re: Amendment to RMS/FSF GR: Option 4, assert the need to learn and grow from recent events Gard Spreemann
Re: Cancel "culture" is a threat to Debian Gard Spreemann
Re: Amendment to RMS/FSF GR: Option 4, assert the need to learn and grow from recent events Milan Kupcevic
Re: Cancel "culture" is a threat to Debian Pasha
Re: Cancel "culture" is a threat to Debian Pierre-Elliott Bécue
Re: Re: Cancel "culture" is a threat to Debian Sergey B Kirpichev
Re: Re: Cancel "culture" is a threat to Debian Steve McIntyre
Re: Cancel "culture" is a threat to Debian Pierre-Elliott Bécue
Re: Cancel "culture" is a threat to Debian Tiago Bortoletto Vaz
Re: Amendment to RMS/FSF GR: Option 4, assert the need to learn and grow from recent events Richard Laager
Re: Amendment to RMS/FSF GR: Option 4, assert the need to learn and grow from recent events Richard Laager
Re: Amendment to RMS/FSF GR: Option 4, assert the need to learn and grow from recent events Richard Laager
Re: Amendment to RMS/FSF GR: Option 4, assert the need to learn and grow from recent events Kurt Roeckx
Re: Cancel "culture" is a threat to Debian Taowa
Re: Amendment to RMS/FSF GR: Option 4, assert the need to learn and grow from recent events Sean Whitton
Announcing new decision making procedures for Debian Enrico Zini
Re: Announcing new decision making procedures for Debian Milan Kupcevic
Re: Announcing new decision making procedures for Debian Alejandro Nadal
Re: Announcing new decision making procedures for Debian Milan Kupcevic
Re: Willingness to share a position statement? Steve Langasek
Re: Announcing new decision making procedures for Debian Jessica Clarke
Re: Announcing new decision making procedures for Debian Louis-Philippe Véronneau
Re: Announcing new decision making procedures for Debian martin f krafft
Re: Announcing new decision making procedures for Debian Donald Norwood

The last update was on 10:26 GMT Thu Mar 02. There are 431 messages. Page 1 of 1.

[previous month]

[previous page]

Page 1 of 1

[next page]

[Thread Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

Mail converted by MHonArc