On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 07:21:36PM +0100, Gard Spreemann wrote: > >> Essentially, voting in this GR is implicitly > >> compulsory and there is only one correct way to vote. > > > > > > Also not true. The GR is to vote whether Debian issues a statement about > > this or not. If you think Debian shouldn't issue a statement about this, > > that's a totally valid opinion. The point of the GR is to gauge whether the > > majority of DDs think that the project should or should not issue a > > statement. We won't know until the voting is over whether that's the > > case. > > I'm very sorry if I misunderstood something (this is the first GR to > come up since I joined the project, please excuse the > handholding/noise), but isn't this a GR over whether or not Debian > issues a *specific* statement about the matter? Yes. Though you can always propose an amendment. > It puts those of us who may wish for Debian to make *a* statement, but > dislike the broadness of the open letter that is under consideration for > ratification, in a difficult spot. If no amendments are proposed, just vote A=FD or FD>A? -- WBR, wRAR
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature