Re: Resolving the controversy
On Sat, Nov 22 2008, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> Really? you didn't explain why; what I'm asking is what you did to fix
> the bugs you believe to violate your interpretation of DFSG. That's my
> point (dunno what you understood)
If you want to see what kind of work some DD is doing, can you
take it to private email instead?
>> matter, and I'll ask you to kindly stop attacking people instead of
> is this your argumentation?
It is mine. Pleas take all argumentum ad hominem off the
debian-vote mailing list.
>> If all you're interested in doing is demanding my credentials and
>> painting me as an outsider, I don't think this contributes to the
>> discussion at all.
> It contributes a lot! experience gives new points of view.
I don't think it matters. You should be looking at the arguments
being made, not the people who are making them. The discussion ought
to stand on its own merit, argument by authority is not something to
> Months are passed and the situation is the same: talk with you is like
> talking to walls. I'm going back to ignore you again, like many others
> do, sorry.
I am afraid that if you persist in this line of attacking people
rather than their arguments, I might be forced into a similar opinion.
Lockwood's Long Shot: The chances of getting eaten up by a lion on Main
Street aren't one in a million, but once would be enough.
Manoj Srivastava <firstname.lastname@example.org> <http://www.debian.org/~srivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C