[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Resolving the controversy

"Sandro Tosi" <morph@debian.org> writes:

> On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 10:34, Ben Finney <ben+debian@benfinney.id.au> wrote:
> > Jacob Hallén <jacob@openend.se> writes:
> >> Debian is not 100% free software, and it never has been.
> >
> > Indeed. Those instances where it's not free are bugs to be fixed.
> So, you actually wanna do something to fix those bugs or wanna simply
> talk about them?

That's a false dichotomy. The talk in this context is regarding
whether they are DFSG violations at all.

> I see too many emails sent and too few RC bugs fixed. If you (like
> others) would really work for Debian instead of only filling
> lists.d.o archives, Debian would be a better distribution, but maybe
> it's not in your interest.

Whereas I don't think it's acceptable to allow false statements or
poor argument to go unchallenged, especially when discussing a vote on
a resolution that impacts the foundation documents of the project.

Note that we can both have what we are asking for: discussing a
general resolution does not preclude working to improve Debian.

 \         “What you have become is the price you paid to get what you |
  `\                                 used to want.” —Mignon McLaughlin |
_o__)                                                                  |
Ben Finney

Reply to: