Re: Resolving the controversy
Russ Allbery <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> Ben Finney <email@example.com> writes:
> > Indeed, and I've no wish to impede anyone in efforts to fix bugs.
> > I'm arguing for interpretation of the social contract such that
> > DFSG violations are bugs by definition, so they can be fixed as
> > such.
> The DFSG doesn't define bugs. It defines release-critical bugs. Bugs
> that are not release-critical are still occasionally fixed. :)
Yes, I agree. I don't know what else you expect; have I given reason
to make you think I'd disagree with that statement?
\ “A child of five could understand this. Fetch me a child of |
`\ five.” —Groucho Marx |