Re: Resolving the controversy
On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 13:41, Ben Finney <email@example.com> wrote:
> "Sandro Tosi" <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
>> On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 10:34, Ben Finney <email@example.com> wrote:
>> > Jacob Hallén <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
>> >> Debian is not 100% free software, and it never has been.
>> > Indeed. Those instances where it's not free are bugs to be fixed.
>> So, you actually wanna do something to fix those bugs or wanna simply
>> talk about them?
> That's a false dichotomy. The talk in this context is regarding
> whether they are DFSG violations at all.
Really? so can you please show us what you've done to fix them?
>> I see too many emails sent and too few RC bugs fixed. If you (like
>> others) would really work for Debian instead of only filling
>> lists.d.o archives, Debian would be a better distribution, but maybe
>> it's not in your interest.
> Whereas I don't think it's acceptable to allow false statements or
> poor argument to go unchallenged, especially when discussing a vote on
> a resolution that impacts the foundation documents of the project.
You're discussing docs for a project you're NOT part of, and you're
proposing resolutions/suggestions you can NOT even vote for or
against; I can't see the point.
> Note that we can both have what we are asking for: discussing a
> general resolution does not preclude working to improve Debian.
Sure we can, then why don't do both instead of just writing emails?
Sandro Tosi (aka morph, Morpheus, matrixhasu)
My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/
Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi