Re: A question to the Debian community ...
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 12:34:47PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 12:29:56PM +0200, Sven Luther <email@example.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 11:03:48AM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
> > > Holger Levsen <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > > > On Thursday 10 May 2007 10:15, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> > > > > The expulsion procedure doesn't call for a vote, so your 70:7 statistic
> > > > > is irrelevant.
> > > > It's also wrong.
> > > So what is the count that DAMs received? I mean, if one says that's wrong,
> > > then one should know what is right in order to say that.
> > I use the 70:7 statistic, after having counted the actual mails to
> > -private, leaving out the dubious ones, in order to be fair to the other
> > side.
> Considering DAMs expressed explicitely that opinions should be sent
> directly to them, how can you consider mails to -private as a metric ?
The expulsion procedure calls for such statements to be sent to both the
DAMs and to -private. So it's reasonable to discount mails from developers
who didn't follow directions, isn't it?
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.