Re: Anton's amendment
On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 04:44:59PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>
> This is a procedural nightmare. What happens if we do split
> things and Anton's proposal asses, we issue a statement, and the DFSG
> amendment fails? We'll have a contradiction between a position
> statement and the DFSG, which is bad.
This would mean that Debian developers decided that DFSG do not
require clarification.
Notice BTW, that the interpretation of DFSG that I proposed is not the
only one possible interpretation of DFSG that makes my proposal about
GFDL consistent with DFSG.
Anton Zinoviev
Reply to: