Re: Anton's amendment

To: debian-vote@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Anton's amendment
From: Yavor Doganov <yavor@doganov.org>
Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2006 23:00:36 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] pan.2006.02.01.21.00.34.769627@doganov.org>
References: <[🔎] 87irrzwnl1.fsf@glaurung.internal.golden-gryphon.com> <[🔎] e8bbf0360602010746h373d88e3k4882577e9ed70e33@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] pan.2006.02.01.16.17.44.773789@doganov.org> <[🔎] 20060201173546.GH16728@rock.grep.be> <[🔎] 87slr2dgjn.wl%yavor@doganov.org> <[🔎] 878xsudcys.fsf@becket.becket.net>

On Wed, 01 Feb 2006 12:46:19 -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:

> Which means that you are perhaps arguing that we should make the change to
> the DFSG which the amendment in question calls for.  

I agree with this (e.g. that the Invariant sections are
DFSG-compliant):

http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2006/01/msg00240.html

Since you and the Secretary (probably others as well) are interpeting
the DFSG in a different way, perhaps it is a good idea to clarify that
particular sentence, but it is not an obstacle for the current GR.

-- 
Yavor Doganov

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Anton's amendment
  - From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>
- Re: Anton's amendment
  - From: Daniel Ruoso <daniel@ruoso.com>

References:
- Anton's amendment
  - From: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org>
- Re: Anton's amendment
  - From: Margarita Manterola <margamanterola@gmail.com>
- Re: Anton's amendment
  - From: Yavor Doganov <yavor@doganov.org>
- Re: Anton's amendment
  - From: Wouter Verhelst <wouter@debian.org>
- Re: Anton's amendment
  - From: Yavor Doganov <yavor@doganov.org>
- Re: Anton's amendment
  - From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>

Prev by Date: Re: Anton's amendment
Next by Date: Re: Anton's amendment
Previous by thread: Re: Anton's amendment
Next by thread: Re: Anton's amendment
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread