[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: First call for vote on immediate vote under section 4.2.2

also sprach MJ Ray <mjr@phonecoop.coop> [2006.10.30.1107 +0100]:
> If that impression is accurate, it means the DPL is not making
> "decisions which are consistent with the consensus of the opinions
> of the Developers" as he was elected to do.  That is to say: this
> trouble is partly the DPL's fault.

Please go read my post again. I said a *minority* is making *most*
of the noise. That has nothing to do with the DPL.

> > So far, I stand firmly behind aj in all of his decisions. I am
> > glad to see a DPL in charge who is looking for ways to shake up
> > the project before we rust or lose touch with reality.
> Lose touch with reality?  Seems a bit late for that, when there
> are DDs claiming to be glad to have a disruptive DPL who they say
> is just looking for ways to cause trouble, while also whinging
> about the disruption!

I neither said disruption nor trouble.

Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
 .''`.   martin f. krafft <madduck@debian.org>
: :'  :  proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
"my experience is that as soon as people are old enough to know better,
 they don't know anything at all."
                                                        -- oscar wilde

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)

Reply to: