Re: First call for vote on immediate vote under section 4.2.2
martin f krafft <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> also sprach Hamish Moffatt <email@example.com> [2006.10.29.1209 +0100]:
> > Frankly the theme on debian-vote lately seems to be "vote  the
> > opposite of anything proposed by Aj!". Not helpful.
> This is not my impression. My impression is that there's a small
> number of opponents making most of the noise. It's the 80/20 rule
> all over again.
If that impression is accurate, it means the DPL is not making "decisions
which are consistent with the consensus of the opinions of the Developers"
as he was elected to do. That is to say: this trouble is partly the
A look back over the discussions makes for interesting reading: different
issues have very different people unhappy with the DPL.
> So far, I stand firmly behind aj in all of his decisions. I am glad
> to see a DPL in charge who is looking for ways to shake up the
> project before we rust or lose touch with reality.
Lose touch with reality? Seems a bit late for that, when there are DDs
claiming to be glad to have a disruptive DPL who they say is just looking
for ways to cause trouble, while also whinging about the disruption!
My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/
Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct