[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: First call for vote on immediate vote under section 4.2.2



On Sun, Oct 29, 2006 at 11:13:06AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> > - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> > 2808c3bb-6d17-49b6-98c8-c6a0a24bc686
> > [ 0 ] Choice 1: The DPL's withdrawal of the delegation remains on hold pending a vote
> > [ 0 ] Choice 2: The DPL's withdrawal of the delegation stands until a vote
> > - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> 
> I don't actually know whether 0/0 is as invalid as I want it to be,
> but we'll see.

It should be. I voted 9/9 indicating my contempt for this vote, but it
wasn't accepted.

> Finally, I am getting annoyed by all these GRs and the waste of time
> that comes with them. Maybe I should thus propose a vote to resolve
> that DDs must now stop wasting time and get back to work.

Hear hear.

Frankly the theme on debian-vote lately seems to be "vote [1] the
opposite of anything proposed by Aj!". Not helpful.


Hamish
-- 
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <hamish@debian.org> <hamish@cloud.net.au>



Reply to: