Re: SPI opacity, was: Vote Robinson for DPL!
On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 04:35:25PM +0000, MJ Ray wrote:
> John Goerzen <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 03:08:52PM +0000, MJ Ray wrote:
> > > It would help if SPI announced its board meeting dates more widely.
> > I do e-mail spi-general with the info about 2 weeks in advance.
> Why would I look for announcements on the list for "General
> discussions related to Software in the Public Interest"
> rather than the one labelled "Software in the Public Interest
Originally, when I started sending them, I was just sending them to
general since I wanted to keep the volume on -announce down for those
that want a low-volume list. But your point makes sense. I'll send
them to -announce from now on.
> > [...] It's about time I learn how to edit the SPI site, I suppose.
> If you find out, please add it to the site. I have no idea where to
> send a patch against what to. I see the cookiemonster CMSes are
> discussed on spi-general, which would bar some, but it would be
> nice to know what's currently used to see if it's editable.
It's using wml (same thing as Debian uses?) in a CVS repository on
chic.spi-inc.org. If you are willing to help with our website, GREAT!
I don't know if that CVS repo is public, but the place to ask about that
-- and about pitching in to help -- is the spi-www list. I'll do some
checking as well.