Re: Ready to vote on 2004-003?
On Sat, May 22, 2004 at 07:11:57PM +0100, Henning Makholm wrote:
> In this particular case, the delegate refuses to share his
> interpretation of the proposed texts, meaning that the developers have
> no idea about which of the proposals will actually cause him to
> consider himself overridden.
There seems to be some opinion that the social contract forbids
the release policy desired by the people wishing to overrule the
delegate in question.
Also, the people who disagree with this have been remarkably shy in
expressing their reasoning. [And rather vocal on tangential issues.]