On Wed, May 19, 2004 at 09:21:38AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > > If you're not happy with what you've gotten us into, work out a solution > > yourself. You've got _plenty_ of avenues. > It seems to me that you are being deliberately obstructive. I have _entirely_ removed myself from any influence in this situation. If the release policy needs to reflect the social contract, the technical committee have been asked to set it. If a general resolution is needed, everyone else's vote counts exactly the same as mine does. > It makes > me suspect that you cooked up a bogus "interpretation" deliberately to Yes, I realise you take every opportunity to think the worst of people you disagree with. > But there is another explanation: that you just don't want to > cooperate, I don't see any reason to "cooperate" with people who think the worst of me at every opportunity; there's no point to that. If you want my cooperation, earn it. If you don't think I'm worth respecting, learn to live with the consequences. Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> Don't assume I speak for anyone but myself. GPG signed mail preferred. ``Like the ski resort of girls looking for husbands and husbands looking for girls, the situation is not as symmetrical as it might seem.''
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature