Re: Ready to vote on 2004-003?
> > In other words, with the new social contract, there should be no
> > problem releasing Sarge with GFDL and other such stuff in main?
On Wed, May 19, 2004 at 10:01:46PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Sure, since we were practically at the brink of releasing
> Sarge, anyway, and, as I said in the proposal life does not stop
> just because we changed a foundation document.
...
> I think that this is not something the tech ctte needs to
> hand to the project from up on high. I believe that we ought to
> continue to support users, bug fixes, overdue releases, etc. while
> we work towards changing stuff to meet the new SC --- however, this
> is something we need to get a buy in from the majority of the
> developers.
>
> There is a time and a place for tech ctte to take things into
> its own hands, but, this, I think, is not such a time.
I guess what you're saying is that you think "releasing Sarge" is a
good idea, but not such an obviously valid idea that we should proceed
with that idea without a GR that explicitly states that that's what we
should do?
If that's the case, I don't see why Anthony should treat it as such an
obviously valid idea that he should proceed with that idea without a GR
that explicitly states that that's what he should do.
--
Raul
Reply to: