[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Ready to vote on 2004-003?

On Wed, 19 May 2004 17:29:30 -0400, Raul Miller <moth@debian.org> said: 

> On Wed, May 19, 2004 at 02:15:57PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
>> I thought carefully about the last resolution, and assumed that it
>> was blindingly obvious that of course changes would get phased in
>> over a period of tim.

> I didn't see anything that made this obvious -- can you explain to
> me the basis for this assumption?

	The fact there was a precedent for this? When we first
 adopted the DFSG, we did not throw out everything all at once --
 indeed, there was a release within a few days of adoption of the
 DFSG, and that release certainly did not meet the DFSG and the new
 social contract.

	Why would it be reasonbable to believe that the behaviour of
 the project would be radically different from how we have done things
 in the past?

"I don't see the problem.  Satan is a Christian God.  Satanists are a
kind of off-beat christians.  They don't need a group of their own --
they belong in some christian group, or talk.religion.misc at most."
Thomas Gramstad (bfu@ifi.uio.no)
Manoj Srivastava   <srivasta@debian.org>  <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05  CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C

Reply to: