Re: Ready to vote on 2004-003?
On Wed, May 19, 2004 at 05:55:35PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> >> The fact there was a precedent for this? When we first adopted the
> >> DFSG, we did not throw out everything all at once -- indeed, there
> >> was a release within a few days of adoption of the DFSG, and that
> >> release certainly did not meet the DFSG and the new social
> >> contract.
In other words, with the new social contract, there should be no problem
releasing Sarge with GFDL and other such stuff in main?
On Wed, May 19, 2004 at 07:22:08PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> As I mentioned in -ctte; I think this is for the whole
> project membership to decide. Proposal E is essentially a formalized
> grandfathering guideline.
In other words, the Technical Committee shouldn't say that, with the
new social contract, there should be no problem releasing Sarge with
GFDL and other such stuff in main?
--
Raul
Reply to: