[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: GRs, irrelevant amendments, and insincere voting

On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 19:30:14 -0500, Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org> said: 

> On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 01:28:24PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> Umm, consider a ballot: 1432. It may mean mean I like option A, and
>> though I may not like further discussion, I like the other options
>> even less than further discussion.
>> Ranking options below furter discussion does not mean I like
>> further discussion. It means I like the rest _less_.

> Is there *ever* a strategic advantage, then, to not ranking "further
> discussion" immediately behind your most-preferred-choice?

	The desire to form common cause with your fellow developers to
 create the best OS ever?  If we have come to the point where we do
 not have common cause, then tweaking a process can't fix the social

Sex is like air.  It's only a big deal if you can't get any.
Manoj Srivastava   <srivasta@debian.org>  <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05  CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C

Reply to: