Re: GRs, irrelevant amendments, and insincere voting
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Is there *ever* a strategic advantage, then, to not ranking "further
> discussion" immediately behind your most-preferred-choice?
Assuming your true preference is (A->B->D->C) ([1243]) where D is the
default option and A, B, and C require a 3:1 majority over the default
option and the following situation:
[ABCD]
[1332]: 0
[3132]: 299
[2221]: 100
you are better off voting your true preference [1243] than [1332].
Don Armstrong
--
UF: What's your favourite coffee blend?
PD: Dark Crude with heavy water. You are understandink? "If geiger
counter does not click, the coffee, she is just not thick."
http://www.donarmstrong.com
http://www.anylevel.com
http://rzlab.ucr.edu
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: GRs, irrelevant amendments, and insincere voting
- From: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org>
- Re: GRs, irrelevant amendments, and insincere voting
- From: Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>
- Re: GRs, irrelevant amendments, and insincere voting
- From: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org>
- Re: GRs, irrelevant amendments, and insincere voting
- From: Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>
- Re: GRs, irrelevant amendments, and insincere voting
- From: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org>
- Re: GRs, irrelevant amendments, and insincere voting
- From: Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>
- Re: GRs, irrelevant amendments, and insincere voting
- From: Raul Miller <moth@magenta.com>
- Re: GRs, irrelevant amendments, and insincere voting
- From: Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>
- Re: GRs, irrelevant amendments, and insincere voting
- From: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org>
- Re: GRs, irrelevant amendments, and insincere voting
- From: Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>