Re: GRs, irrelevant amendments, and insincere voting
On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 01:28:24PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Umm, consider a ballot: 1432. It may mean mean I like option
> A, and though I may not like further discussion, I like the other
> options even less than further discussion.
>
> Ranking options below furter discussion does not mean I like
> further discussion. It means I like the rest _less_.
Is there *ever* a strategic advantage, then, to not ranking "further
discussion" immediately behind your most-preferred-choice?
I am assuming, for the purposes of this question, that there is an
option on the ballot that doesn't disgust the voter.
--
G. Branden Robinson | I've made up my mind. Don't try to
Debian GNU/Linux | confuse me with the facts.
branden@debian.org | -- Indiana Senator Earl Landgrebe
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: GRs, irrelevant amendments, and insincere voting
- From: Anthony DeRobertis <asd@suespammers.org>
- Re: GRs, irrelevant amendments, and insincere voting
- From: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org>
- Re: GRs, irrelevant amendments, and insincere voting
- From: Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>
- Re: GRs, irrelevant amendments, and insincere voting
- From: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org>
- Re: GRs, irrelevant amendments, and insincere voting
- From: Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>
- Re: GRs, irrelevant amendments, and insincere voting
- From: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org>
- Re: GRs, irrelevant amendments, and insincere voting
- From: Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>
- Re: GRs, irrelevant amendments, and insincere voting
- From: Raul Miller <moth@magenta.com>
- Re: GRs, irrelevant amendments, and insincere voting
- From: Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>
- Re: GRs, irrelevant amendments, and insincere voting
- From: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org>