[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: GRs, irrelevant amendments, and insincere voting

On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 05:20:59AM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 06:22:44PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > As a matter of practice, don't we generally distribute such CDs and
> > brochures freely-licensed?
> AFAIK, even our own logo is under a non-free license. I might be
> mistaken, though. (there has been an ironic comment on this matter by
> somebody either on -private or -vote lately about this)

The Open Use logo is freely licensed, isn't it?  If it isn't, it should

I suppose retaining restrictive licensing on the Official Use logo
because I think it can have utility for purposes not directly relevant
to the distribution of an operating system.

However, this is very much a discussion for another list, like -project.

G. Branden Robinson                |    You should try building some of the
Debian GNU/Linux                   |    stuff in main that is
branden@debian.org                 |    modern...turning on -Wall is like
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |    turning on the pain. -- James Troup

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: