[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: GRs, irrelevant amendments, and insincere voting



On Sun, Nov 02, 2003 at 12:19:00PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Nov 2003 08:54:32 -0500, Anthony DeRobertis <asd@suespammers.org> said: 
> > Indeed, from his comments, I think even the Branden might be happy
> > with the two separated, as long as they are on two different
> > ballots.
> 
> 	If this is the case, the proposal should be so amended.  There
>  would be no problem running two votes, either in sequence, or
>  concurrently. 

I'll give it very serious consideration, but first I would like some
guidance from you in the form of a reply to Message-ID:
<20031102100909.GW2495@deadbeast.net>.

-- 
G. Branden Robinson                |       The key to being a Southern
Debian GNU/Linux                   |       Baptist: It ain't a sin if you
branden@debian.org                 |       don't get caught.
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |       -- Anthony Davidson

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: