[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: GRs, irrelevant amendments, and insincere voting

On Sun, 2 Nov 2003 08:54:32 -0500, Anthony DeRobertis <asd@suespammers.org> said: 

> On Nov 1, 2003, at 23:51, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> Whoa there.  Some would consider that the editorial changes and
>> dropping section 5 are orthogonal changes, since we can have one,
>> or the other, or both, and neither affects each other.

> I would be one of them, and I think that if someone proposes, and 5
> second, just the editorial changes --- or just the SC 5 dropping ---
> it should be on a separate ballot.

> Indeed, from his comments, I think even the Branden might be happy
> with the two separated, as long as they are on two different
> ballots.

	If this is the case, the proposal should be so amended.  There
 would be no problem running two votes, either in sequence, or

skldfjkljklsR%^&(IXDRTYju187pkasdjbasdfbuil h;asvgy8p
23r1vyui135 2 kmxsij90TYDFS$$b jkzxdjkl bjnk ;j
sdoihjfh(_YU*G&F^*CTY98y Now look what you've gone and done!  You've
broken it!
Manoj Srivastava   <srivasta@debian.org>  <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05  CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C

Reply to: