Re: Proposed ballot for the constitutional amendment
On Wed, 15 Oct 2003 06:29:33 +0100 (CET), Peter Karlsson <firstname.lastname@example.org> said:
> Manoj Srivastava:
>> If people cannot understand: "Do _NOT_ encrypt your ballot; the
>> voting mechanism shall not be able to decrypt your message." they
>> should not be getting a say in amending our constitution.
> To me, the meaning seems clear: The voting software is located in a
> jurisdiction where encryption is not allowed, so it may not read
> encrypted ballots.
As long as you do not send encrypted ballots, your speculation
about the reasons does not matter.
> I just re-read the book on English grammar I used in school, and it
> says that your use of "shall" is valid in British English, but only
> for the first person, not for the third person as it is used
> above. "I shall not be able to...", but "It will not be able to...".
I think you need a better grammar book.
I shall ... They will.
I will ... They shall.
Machines have less problems. I'd like to be a machine. Andy Warhol
Manoj Srivastava <email@example.com> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C