Hi, On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 11:04:16AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > Discussion" choice is unranked, then it is equal to all other unranked > choices, if any -- no special consideration is given to the "Further > Discussion" choice by the voting software). If the software implements the quota and supermajority checking the last half sentence becomes false. Maybe everything after the "if any" should be omitted? > your ballot; the voting mechanism shall not be able to decrypt your > message. I'm no native speaker of english, but that "shall" seems strange to me. Maybe a "will" would be more appropriate? > Proposal B: Clarifies status of non-technical documents. Does *not > > * > create a class of Foundation Documents. The layout is broken here. I hope this helps, Jochen -- http://seehuhn.de/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature