[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Proposed ballot for the constitutional amendment


On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 11:04:16AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Discussion" choice is unranked, then it is equal to all other unranked
> choices, if any -- no special consideration is given to the "Further
> Discussion" choice by the voting software).
If the software implements the quota and supermajority checking
the last half sentence becomes false.  Maybe everything after the
"if any" should be omitted?

> your ballot; the voting mechanism shall not be able to decrypt your
> message.
I'm no native speaker of english, but that "shall" seems strange to
me.  Maybe a "will" would be more appropriate?

> Proposal B: Clarifies status of non-technical documents.  Does *not
> * 
> create a class of Foundation Documents.
The layout is broken here.

I hope this helps,

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: