Re: If Linux Is About Choice, Why Then ...
GiaThnYgeia <GiaThnYgeia@openmailbox.org> writes:
> Am I wrong?
You have at least nothing but opinion supporting the assertion that you
are right. So the jury is out on that one.
> I don't hear newbies single machine users having much of an issue with
> systemd, but people whose work for many years was based in fine-tuning
> other init systems seem to be having issues in adopting to this new
> status-quo whether they like it or not.
Here's a data point: having dealt with the vagaries and shortcomings of
SysV init professionally, I *like* systemd, even if it has a few warts.
Mart
--
"We will need a longer wall when the revolution comes."
--- AJS, quoting an uncertain source.
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: If Linux Is About Choice, Why Then ...
- From: Patrick Bartek <nemommxiv@gmail.com>
- Re: If Linux Is About Choice, Why Then ...
- From: Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net>
- Re: If Linux Is About Choice, Why Then ...
- Re: If Linux Is About Choice, Why Then ...
- From: Joel Rees <joel.rees@gmail.com>
- Re: If Linux Is About Choice, Why Then ...
- From: Joe <joe@jretrading.com>
- Re: If Linux Is About Choice, Why Then ...
- From: Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org>
- Re: If Linux Is About Choice, Why Then ...
- Re: If Linux Is About Choice, Why Then ...
- From: Nicolas George <george@nsup.org>
- Re: If Linux Is About Choice, Why Then ...
- Re: If Linux Is About Choice, Why Then ...
- From: GiaThnYgeia <GiaThnYgeia@openmailbox.org>
- Re: If Linux Is About Choice, Why Then ...
- From: David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk>
- Re: If Linux Is About Choice, Why Then ...
- From: GiaThnYgeia <GiaThnYgeia@openmailbox.org>