Le primidi 21 germinal, an CCXXV, tomas@tuxteam.de a écrit : > SysV init is broken because it has no process monitoring? No. > Process monitoring isn't in its scope. Your other arguments make sense, but sorry, this one does not. The process with PID one is the only immortal process on the system, and adopts all orphan processes. For that reason, any kind of process monitoring, if it needs reliability, must be rooted in PID 1. And in turn, that makes process monitoring in scope for any project that aims to implement a program for PID 1. And that is what makes SysV init unsalvageable. Socket activation, automounting, etc., are entirely optional and peripheral. Process monitoring is not. Regards, -- Nicolas George
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature