Re: Re; Okay, that's too much now!
On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 06:05:26AM +1000, Andrew McGlashan wrote:
> On 8/09/2015 5:09 AM, Bob Holtzman wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 07, 2015 at 05:29:14PM +1000, Andrew McGlashan wrote:
> >> On 7/09/2015 7:15 AM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> >>> I gather Devuan is doing well. So there are choices. One of course is stick
> >>> with Debian, and work to rename all the libraries whose names cause such
> >>> distress. "A rose by any other name would smell as sweet."
> ... this bit "A rose....", see further below.
> >> And re-branding Monsanto is still ... Monsanto. Renaming is just hiding
> >> the facts or at least making them harder to be seen.
> > Maybe I'm misreading your post but Devuan isn't simply renamed Debian.
> >>From what I gather from the web site, it's Debian *without* systemd.
> Oh no, I wasn't meaning anything to do with Devuan; Lisi mentioned about
> renaming systemd related parts, my view is that this would just mask the
> fact that it is systemd, in effect an attempt to mislead the users as to
> the real facts.
> Devuan is very admirable, great work by them.
Yup, I did misread it!
A fair fight is the result of poor planning.