[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: mutt can't send mail (Interrupted system call)



On Tue 22 Jul 2014 at 22:41:31 +0200, Tony Baldwin wrote:

> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 06:50:54PM +0100, Brian wrote:
> > On Tue 22 Jul 2014 at 13:50:13 +0000, Curt wrote:
> > 
> > > On 2014-07-22, Tony Baldwin <tonyb@myownsite.me> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Ultimately, that's what I'd like to determine, but have so far not been
> > > > able to. The error is too vague (Interrupted System Call), and all the
> > > > googling and duckgoing and ixquicking has produced nothing useful.
> > > >
> > > 
> > > We need to see your config.
> > 
> > Thirded. (Because the request has been made twice already).
> > 
> > I'm loath to move someone on to exim if there is a fixable mutt config.
> > Not that there is any wrong with exim but if mutt is using 'smtp_url'
> > the OP must have a reason for it.
> 
> Okay, but keep in mind, I have mutt on two machines, my desktop, and my
> server. Both are running wheezy, and both are using the same muttrc
> files (I have two because I use it with two different accounts, using
> mutt -F otherconfig to access the second account).
> 
> I have copied the muttrc for this account to
> http://tonyb.myownsite.me/pages/muttrc.txt (password removed, of course).
> Same muttrc on both the server and desktop.
> mutt works perfectly with both accounts from the server, not from the
> desktop.
> For this reason, I don't think the rc file is significant, since it
> works on one machine fine, but what the heck...worth a shot.

At the very least it allows us to see that the line

  set smtp_url = "smtp://tonyb@myownsite.me:PASSWORDHERE@mail.myownsite.me:25"

looks sensible and correct. It also confirms that on the desktop you are
not using exim as the MTA but the MTA built into mutt. This MTA will
contact the MTA on myownsite.me (postfix), which will relay the mail.

You have an account with gmx.com; a mail sent to that account with the
line above unaltered might be expected to be recorded in postfix's logs.
Is it?


Reply to: