Re: sad but true, Linux sucks, a bit
On Sat, 2014-01-18 at 18:01 +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> On 1/18/14, Chris Bannister <cbannister@slingshot.co.nz> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 07:13:17PM +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> >> Certainly humans have technology, and gadgets, and technological power
> >> (awesome chariots, ...
> >
> > Mmmm, so the last chariot I saw wasn't on "Ben Hur"?
>
> Yes, definitely, and did you notice the fine leather work on those
> chariots? the Selley's poly glue stuff used to join the spokes of the
> wheels to the rims? the fine muck-metal buckles for the reins (muck
> metal is _so_ inexpensive it's awesome!)
>
> :)
http://antiqwatch.com/all/bronnikovs-unique-wooden-pocket-watches.html
Not antique, a Russian still build such watches. But of cause, an atomic
clock is more precise ... that reminds me to run ntpdate, because
computer clocks are the most precise clocks ;).
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: sad but true, Linux sucks, a bit
- From: Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mardorf@alice-dsl.net>
- Re: sad but true, Linux sucks, a bit
- From: Jarth Berilcosm <jarth@yahoo.com>
- Re: sad but true, Linux sucks, a bit
- Re: sad but true, Linux sucks, a bit
- From: Robert Brockway <robert@timetraveller.org>
- Re: sad but true, Linux sucks, a bit
- From: Iain M Conochie <iain@thargoid.co.uk>
- Re: sad but true, Linux sucks, a bit
- From: Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mardorf@alice-dsl.net>
- Re: sad but true, Linux sucks, a bit
- From: Robert Holtzman <holtzm@cox.net>
- Re: sad but true, Linux sucks, a bit
- From: Ma Xiaojun <damage3025@gmail.com>
- Re: sad but true, Linux sucks, a bit
- From: Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mardorf@alice-dsl.net>
- Re: sad but true, Linux sucks, a bit
- From: Zenaan Harkness <zen@freedbms.net>
- Re: sad but true, Linux sucks, a bit
- From: Chris Bannister <cbannister@slingshot.co.nz>
- Re: sad but true, Linux sucks, a bit
- From: Zenaan Harkness <zen@freedbms.net>