Re: sad but true, Linux sucks, a bit
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 10:32:07AM +0900, Joel Rees wrote:
> As food for thought, it seems to me that the other problem, while I
> assume it's the one you reference in your comment about rules,
> involves principles of human condition which parallel the computer
> security problem. If you don't see what I mean, consider, who pays for
> the server space and internet bandwidth, why, and with what money?
What! Surely it is simpler than that? Would you discuss the same things
with your boss as you would with your sexual counsellor. If your boss *is*
your sexual counsellor then substitute "sexual counsellor" with
partner(s) or mistress, whichever is appropriate.
--
"If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people
who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the
oppressing." --- Malcolm X
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: sad but true, Linux sucks, a bit
- From: Iain M Conochie <iain@thargoid.co.uk>
- Re: sad but true, Linux sucks, a bit
- From: Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mardorf@alice-dsl.net>
- Re: sad but true, Linux sucks, a bit
- From: Robert Holtzman <holtzm@cox.net>
- Re: sad but true, Linux sucks, a bit
- From: Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mardorf@alice-dsl.net>
- Re: sad but true, Linux sucks, a bit
- From: Robert Holtzman <holtzm@cox.net>
- Re: sad but true, Linux sucks, a bit
- From: Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mardorf@alice-dsl.net>
- Re: sad but true, Linux sucks, a bit
- From: Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mardorf@alice-dsl.net>
- Re: sad but true, Linux sucks, a bit
- From: Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mardorf@alice-dsl.net>
- Re: sad but true, Linux sucks, a bit
- From: Joel Rees <joel.rees@gmail.com>