[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Penalty of SELinux?



Am 2007-09-25 03:11:39, schrieb Mike McCarty:
> It would take more than just kernel, of course. I am investigating
> LFS. Gentoo seems to have accepted SELinux as well, though since
> it is a source distro most of the work would be easier in that
> case, perhaps.

And where is the problem with Debian?

Build a small environement where you can rebuild a bunch Debian packages
at once, where you build first all packages which had the SElinux patches.

Then install a minimal Dbian-Repository where you have the WHOLE base
and the SELinux-Patched packages replaced by your own packages. 

Since I ned sometimes (72 packages) special options enabled, I have build
such environement which autobuild the new (in general stable) packages if
they appear in the Debian security repository.

Then my customers do not use the official Debian-Repositories but my own.

So, no tell me where the problem is?

Thanks, Greetings and nice Day
    Michelle Konzack
    Systemadministrator
    Tamay Dogan Network
    Debian GNU/Linux Consultant


-- 
Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/
##################### Debian GNU/Linux Consultant #####################
Michelle Konzack   Apt. 917                  ICQ #328449886
                   50, rue de Soultz         MSN LinuxMichi
0033/6/61925193    67100 Strasbourg/France   IRC #Debian (irc.icq.com)

Attachment: signature.pgp
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: