Re: Penalty of SELinux?

[Mike McCarty <Mike.McCarty@sbcglobal.net>]

Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Sep 2007 18:21:16 -0500, Mike McCarty <Mike.McCarty@sbcglobal.net> said: 
>
> > Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > > Firstly: Very few packages have been actively patched to link
>
> > Something like 50 or so. ls, mv, cp, etc.
>
>         Source packages.  All those are from coreutils, no?

I believe so. My response was in regards to "very few". I suppose
that is a subjective response. "50 or so" is not subjective.

[snip]

>         Right. But a few hundred KB in memory is a smallish penalty, and

More subjectivity :-)

>  even 708 old hardware seems to be running it fine for me.

My objection is to having on my machine at all.

Mike
--
p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
Oppose globalization and One World Governments like the UN.
This message made from 100% recycled bits.
You have found the bank of Larn.
I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you.
I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!