[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Penalty of SELinux?



Am 2007-09-24 22:16:02, schrieb Mumia W..:
> However, the dependency upon SElinux is more recent. There may be time 
> to remove it before it becomes too entrenched and before its tentacles 
> probe too deeply into Debian.
> 
> I hope it's not too late. I wish I'd educated myself about SELinux 
> earlier, and I wish I could've participated in the discussions about 
> SElinux in Debian. I believe that if more Debian users were aware of the 
> radical nature of SElinux, its complexity and the number of core 
> libraries and utilities that would have to be changed to accommodate it, 
> SElinux's entry into Debian could have been averted.
> 
> Now we are in the unfortunate position of having to convince the 
> maintainer of SElinux to advocate for the removal of his baby from his 
> O/S. :-(
------------------------- END OF REPLIED MESSAGE -------------------------

It seems you have no clue about "What SElinux is".

Thanks, Greetings and nice Day
    Michelle Konzack
    Systemadministrator
    Tamay Dogan Network
    Debian GNU/Linux Consultant


-- 
Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/
##################### Debian GNU/Linux Consultant #####################
Michelle Konzack   Apt. 917                  ICQ #328449886
                   50, rue de Soultz         MSN LinuxMichi
0033/6/61925193    67100 Strasbourg/France   IRC #Debian (irc.icq.com)

Attachment: signature.pgp
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: