Re: Sex spam again on the list
Hi,
On Wed Sep 19, 2007 at 14:09:32 -0700, David Brodbeck wrote:
>
> On Sep 19, 2007, at 12:27 PM, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >On Tue Sep 18, 2007 at 08:36:30 +0200, Peter Teunissen wrote:
> >>For directly blocking mail however, you'd be better of using the
> >>zen.spamhaus.org combined blocklist wich is very effective and has
> >>almost
> >>no false positives. I don't know how they do it, but it catches
> >>90% of my
> >>spam on it's own. More info can be found on http://www.spamhaus.org
> >
> >The proiblem of using RBLs on SMTP-time is that the mail is gone,
> >nevertheless it was UCE or not.
>
> That's true, although the sending server will generate a bounce back
> to the sender. So the mail doesn't disappear down a black hole, at
> least.
Great! with million senders being forged every day that helps a lot.
--
[root@debian /root]# man real-life
No manual entry for real-life
Reply to: