[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Sex spam again on the list



On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 05:27:36PM +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Am 2007-09-09 12:25:59, schrieb Andrew Sackville-West:
> > I know this doesn't really help you, but I've seen a *massive*
> > increase in spam hitting my one server in the last couple of
> > days. Previously I was seeing something like 50 spam a day hitting me
> > (this is after clamav kicks out the virus laden ones, so its not an
> > absolute number). In the last couple of days, I've seen that number
> > pretty much quadruple to around 200 per day. My false negatives have
> 
> Are you joking?

nope. I'm serious.

> 
> I get between 500 and 38000 per day which are mostly filtered by my
> procmailrules, spamassassin and f-prot.
> 

This is not a pissing contest to see who gets more spam. I was merely
providing an anecdotal metric about the recent surge of spam. 

> 50 spams per day is nothing!

nope. its 50 spams per day. I'm sorry that you suffer with a level
that is several orders of magnitude greater than mine, but that
doesn't diminish in any way the number I receive. Any amount of spam
is too much. period.

now what was your point?

regards

A

-- 
current song: Weezer - Say It Ain't So/Remix

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: