On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 09:49:20PM +1300, Chris Bannister wrote: > On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 11:21:04PM -0800, Andrew Sackville-West wrote: > > well, you answered your own question, but here's what I do. > > > > mostly I ignore anyhting marked as <done>. Anything marked as > > <pending> (or other things, are there others?) I review carefully to > > IIRC, there was a post on debian-devel where anything marked as <done> > does not necessarily mean it was resolved/fixed. Something to do with > version tracking in apt-listbugs, although I've never been bitten by > ignoring anything marked as <done>. yeah. I'm just for the first time seeing that with this apt bug. yesterday apt-listbugs showed it as <done> in version 0.6.46.4 but the candidate was still 0.6.46.3. of course now we've caught up and 0.6.46.4 is the candidate. So I've never been bitten by a <done> either, but one must actually read the thing and see what's going on. A
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature