David Hart wrote:
> Then perhaps you should've made it clear that that's what you meant.
> But this is beside the point.
My point was quite clear. I've gone over it in the past. I never
mentioned "in this conversation". I did, in fact, say it was That was your
misunderstanding.
> I've had mutt configured and working as I said it could. Why on earth
> would I waste my time trawling the archives for the words of someone who
> quite clearly doesn't know what he's talking about?
Uhm, because I do?
> So, let's see. You say mutt can't keep _incoming_ mail separate.
Uh, try again. I never said incoming. I said keep mail separate, full
stop, no modifiers.
> I say it can and post a config that demonstrates that it can but,
> you ignore it.
I didn't ignore it, I dismissed it. Why? Because I've seen it before and
know it doesn't address what I have posted. To ignore it would be not to
respond and thus unable to dismiss it.
> Now you say that it can't keep _outgoing_ mail separate. I can see
> where this is heading.
Right, with you backpedalling because you thought you knew what I was
talking about after adding in modifiers that simply were not present.
> Why would you _use_ mutt many times over the years if it's as bad as you
> say?
The same reason people go back to products over the years, to see if their
concerns have been addressed and that a product which many other people swear
by has improved to the point of usability for that individual? Or are you say
that once you have reviewed version v1.0 of a program you would never look at
it again even though they're on v3.5, 10 years later and the program now in no
way resembles the program then?
> You may have written extensively about mutt but it would've been better
> if you had got yourself a clue about it before doing so.
I've got the same understanding as you. Difference is you presumed to
know my position and decided to pontificate accordingly. I find it mildly
ironic that you're telling me to go educate myself when you yourself won't do
the same. So it's ok for you to blast me for my ignorance while being
ignorant of my position, arguments and unknowing of any understanding I have
of mutt? Interesting.
> Now I _know_ that you are habitually belligerent.
Only to mutt zealots who pontificate out of ignorance.
--
Steve C. Lamb | But who decides what they dream?
PGP Key: 8B6E99C5 | And dream I do...
-------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature