on Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 11:13:58PM -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez (roberto@familiasanchez.net) wrote:
> Hamster wrote:
> >On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 19:40:09 -0500
> >"Roberto C. Sanchez" <roberto@familiasanchez.net> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>>Technically he's correct - IE ignores so many of the standards, that
> >>>if you author to the standards, it will work in everything *except*
> >>>IE.
> >
> >
> >>Sorry, but that is not correct. I happen to loathe MS and IE.
> >>However, my website is coded to be valid XHTML 1.0 and CSS, and
> >>*after* I had it validated it only took me all of 15 minutes to go
> >>back and make it so that it worked nearly perfect in IE, Dillo, lynx
> >>and elinks (without breaking the validation and without checking for
> >>and discriminating User-Agent strings).
> >
> >
> >Yes, but if you try to use javascript that conforms completely to the
> >ECMA standard, and avoid all netscape/ie specific methods, it will not
> >work in IE.
> >
> I abhor javascript.
A couple of sites showing what can be done *without* Javascript:
http://www.dzr-web.com/demos/css/
And:
http://css.maxdesign.com.au/listamatic/
Particularly, say:
http://css.maxdesign.com.au/listamatic/vertical09.htm
http://css.maxdesign.com.au/listamatic/horizontal02.htm
http://css.maxdesign.com.au/listamatic/vertical15.htm
...though browsing is strongly recommended.
I've been enhancing the CSS on my own homepage (link below), for fun
and, um. Profit!?
Peace.
--
Karsten M. Self <kmself@ix.netcom.com> http://kmself.home.netcom.com/
What Part of "Gestalt" don't you understand?
You're not a user, nitwit.
- Jeff Waugh, describing GNOME users.
http://zgp.org/pipermail/linux-elitists/2004-January/008588.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature