Re: Programming Languages, "to C or not to C, that is the Q."
On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 05:49:06AM +0200, Micha Feigin wrote:
> BTW, the are cases where c will give you better results then assembly as
> the compiler's optimizer can a lot of time do better work then the
> person.
So, if I use Python and py2c, I can produce code more optimized than
assembly? Cool.
--
Carl Fink carl@fink.to
Jabootu's Minister of Proofreading
http://www.jabootu.com
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: Programming Languages, "to C or not to C, that is the Q."
- From: Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net>
- Re: Programming Languages, "to C or not to C, that is the Q."
- From: Nate Bargmann <n0nb@networksplus.net>
- Re: Programming Languages, "to C or not to C, that is the Q."
- From: Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net>
- Re: Programming Languages, "to C or not to C, that is the Q."
- From: "J.F.Gratton" <grajea01@videotron.ca>
- Re: Programming Languages, "to C or not to C, that is the Q."
- From: Paul E Condon <pecondon@mesanetworks.net>
- Re: Programming Languages, "to C or not to C, that is the Q."
- From: Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net>
- Re: Programming Languages, "to C or not to C, that is the Q."
- From: Paul E Condon <pecondon@mesanetworks.net>
- Re: Programming Languages, "to C or not to C, that is the Q."
- From: Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net>
- Re: Programming Languages, "to C or not to C, that is the Q."
- From: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@debian.org>
- Re: Programming Languages, "to C or not to C, that is the Q."
- From: Micha Feigin <michf@post.tau.ac.il>