Re: ccing
Paul Scott <paslist@ultrasw.com> writes:
> I agree with and do a most of what you and others say. The *only* place
> I think T-bird is more efficient is for my case of a large number of
> mail folders with three levels of structure visible simultaneously on
> the screen. After I choose the folder with the mouse I could easily use
> a mutt style interface.
>
> Faster as far as processor time, etc. is not relevant *if the machine is
> fast enough* since the machine still has to wait for the user to do
> something.
I don't know about that. I've found that mutt is one of the painfully
slowest MUAs around (at least at loading large Maildirs or IMAP folders)
even on very fast computers...
--
You win again, gravity!
Reply to:
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: ccing
- From: "s. keeling" <keeling@spots.ab.ca>
- References:
- ccing
- From: Cheryl Homiak <chomiak@charter.net>
- Re: ccing
- From: "s. keeling" <keeling@spots.ab.ca>
- Re: ccing
- From: Cheryl Homiak <chomiak@charter.net>
- Re: ccing
- From: "s. keeling" <keeling@spots.ab.ca>
- Re: ccing
- From: Paul Scott <paslist@ultrasw.com>
- Re: ccing
- From: "s. keeling" <keeling@spots.ab.ca>
- Re: ccing
- From: Paul Scott <paslist@ultrasw.com>
- Re: ccing
- From: "S.D.A." <dallan@rogers.com>
- Re: ccing
- From: Paul Scott <paslist@ultrasw.com>