Re: Opium [was: Re: freelance sysadmining -- superlong -- [WAS: "Red Hat recommends Windows for consumers"]]
On Mon, 17 Nov 2003 05:20:58 -0600,
Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net> wrote in message
<[🔎] 1069068057.6919.356.camel@haggis.homelan>:
> On Sun, 2003-11-16 at 20:47, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> > On Sun, 16 Nov 2003 16:05:38 -0600,
> > Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net> wrote in message
> > <[🔎] 1069020337.6917.337.camel@haggis.homelan>:
> >
> > > On Sun, 2003-11-16 at 02:30, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> > > > On Sun, 16 Nov 2003 00:52:47 -0600,
> > > > Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net> wrote in message
> > > > <[🔎] 1068965567.6919.81.camel@haggis.homelan>:
> > > >
> > > > > On Sun, 2003-11-16 at 00:18, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> > > [snip]
> > > > > > ..what stops Sissy Boy George from launching a "preventive"
> > > > > > strike to prevent an indictment for war crimes
> > > > >
> > > > > Nuke The Netherlands? <snicker> Better to nuke France, and
> > > > > have the fall-out drift over The Hague.
> > > >
> > > > ..the Serb propaganda shills called this the kanguroo court,
> > > > during the recent Balkan wars. With Slobodan Milosevic getting
> > > > just 40 years, it appears they were right.
> > > > > > and treason under US
> > > > > > Law?
> > > > >
> > > > > Since you invoke US law, you need to know that a sitting
> > > > > President can only be tried for treason by the US Congress.
> > > > > Maybe he could nuke DC?
> > > >
> > > > ..maybe. ;-)
> > > >
> > > > ..and you forgot he is the Supreme Commander and can be tried
> > > > in DC for war crimes, too. In Texas, he signed off how many?
> > > > ;-)
> > >
> > > How many war crimes did he sign off on as governor of Texas?
> > > Zero, of course.
> >
> > ..ah, Slobo's Shill Dance. ;-) I tried to hint towards the number
> > of death row inmates he signed off for execution. How many? ;-)
>
> Slobo's Shill Dance?
..yeah, his shills did this _all_ the time. ;-)
> Yes, I knew what you were hinting at. However, public trials with
> juries of "peers" with convictions for capital offenses, with
> sentences meted out by those same juries can hardly be called war
> crimes. Maybe you can convince me that capital punishment is
> barbarous, morally wrong, and should be abolished,
..why? It is needed to bring justice to people like Saddam,
Kim Jong-il, Bush, bin-Laden, Blair, Milosevic, Chirac, Sharon
and quite a few more.
> but not that it's a war crime.
..correct, assuming fair trials. ;-)
> And thus concludes this threadlet.
.. ;-)
> > .."disbarred". ;-) Funny, I learned otherwise in boot school. ;-)
>
> You can try "War Commanders" for lots of things, but disbarment
> is a civil penalty, not a criminal manner.
..and being removed from Office or Command may likewise be
anywhere from a "civil" diciplinary penalty upwards. ;-)
> > > And calling someone a sissy every other email is just plain bad
> > > form,
> >
> > ..I respectfully disagree: http://awolbush.com/
> > http://www.google.com/search?q=%22George+W.+Bush%22+AWOL
>
> The repetition is still bad form.
..disagreed. ;-)
--
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;-)
...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry...
Scenarios always come in sets of three:
best case, worst case, and just in case.
Reply to: