Re: Opium [was: Re: freelance sysadmining -- superlong -- [WAS: "Red Hat recommends Windows for consumers"]]
On Sat, 15 Nov 2003 18:49:50 -0600,
"Hoyt Bailey" <hoyt13@wiredok.com> wrote in message
<[🔎] 004001c3abdb$93aafcf0$e35a22d0@blackgold>:
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Alfredo Valles" <alfredo@bioinfo.cu>
> To: <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
> Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2003 14:02
> Subject: Re: Opium [was: Re: freelance sysadmining -- superlong --
> [WAS:"Red Hat recommends Windows for consumers"]]
>
>
> > On Saturday 15 November 2003 2:30 pm, Vikki Roemer wrote:
> > > On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 02:17:27PM -0500, Alfredo Valles wrote:
> > > > On Friday 14 November 2003 11:23 pm, Tom wrote:
> > > > > compared to the taliban and the islamists, I cannot believe
> > > > > you are acusing *US* of advocating a theocracy. talk about
> > > > > head up the ass.
> > > >
> > > > But talibans and islamists don't spend billions of dollars a
> > > > year in weapons.
> > >
> > > No, they just fund terrorist groups that fly planes into occupied
> > > skyscrapers.
> >
> > I don't like talibans. But what I mean is that if you launch all the
> > planes on US against New York city it won't cause 10% of the
> > destruction of a single nuclear missile. (I'm sure that US have
> > more nuclear missiles than civil plains).
> >
>
> That just simply isnt true. There may be more than 100,000 civil
> aeroplanes in the US. I doubt there is 10% of that number of missels
> with Nucular tips.
..those 250 000 planes would need nuclear charges to match those
8000 US nukes. They however easily match a single tactical nuke.
> Whatever the number there are likely enough to destroy any country or
> series of conturys that start such an exchange. How many have been
> fired?=0
..what stops Sissy Boy George from launching a "preventive" strike to
prevent an indictment for war crimes and treason under US Law?
--
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;-)
...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry...
Scenarios always come in sets of three:
best case, worst case, and just in case.
Reply to: